
In what will assuredly be the most prolific movie-watching year of my life, I managed to take in some 460 movies in 2009. I will, first and foremost, list the irritable disappointments that you can die happy knowing you didn’t sit through, or, you can choose to disregard and die equally as happy not knowing you didn’t see them. Such utter insults to my scopophilic desires will not be discussed in depths past the limits of which my patience allows. In no particular order of quality. Nick and Nora’s Infinite Playlist (2008) was certainly one of the more tedious and deplorable attempts at quirky teens companionship and climaxing in the strangest (read: awkward) almost sex-scenes ever. Awake didn’t even try to be anything more than formulaic Hollywood trash. If there is one film that, above all others, attempts to question the nature of life itself and succeeds only in making an incoherent and cheesy problem, What the Bleep Do We Know (2004) is it. Neil Jordan fails me with Jodie Foster’s commercial revenge film, The Brave One (2007). The Laramie Project (2002), while an important story, is entirely lost in its cinematic construction. Kiarostami’s Taste of Cherry (1997) is largely considered a masterpiece but was unbearable and not much more. Aside from Sean Penn, I Am Sam (2001) was relatively ineffective and annoying. Godard’s The Rise and Fall of a Small Production Company (1986), which no one reading this will ever see, is in a league of its own. I gave Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004) a second chance and it still gave me nothing. Wendy and Lucy (2008), while almost touching, was not that. Jimmy Stewart proved Harvey (1950) incapable of matching the intrigue of a giant bunny rabbit that a certain other film perfects. Woody Allen’s Scoop (2006) was a theatrical annoyance. Herzog’s disregard for the story made Rescue Dawn (2006) an unfortunate disappointment. Troma’s Orgazmo (1997) and The First Turn On (1983) need no explanation. The long awaited pairing of DeNiro and Pacino was thoroughly mistreated with Righteous Kill (2008). And John Waters’ Pink Flamingos (1972) can’t quite be considered disappointing with my low expectations in mind. Forgetting Sarah Marshall (2008) and The Hangover (2009). Phoebe in Wonderland (2008) was just wholly uninteresting. Whip It (2009) was too immature and high school for my tastes. Paranormal Activity (2009) was for from scary and actually one of the most sedate “horror” movies of the year. And, of course, the grand and unsurprising finale, S. Darko (2009).
Good films are hard to come by and bad ones seem all too easy, yet this list seems pretty meager considering the quantity of films I viewed. That stated, and future posts about good movies in mind, 2009 was perhaps a very successful year.
Haha, a lot of these were viewed together...
ReplyDeleteI found the connection you made between "Harvey" and 'a certain other film' rather interesting; was that what you were expecting when you first saw it? It's sort of funny that the one element they have in common is so obscure and specific, yet they used it in very different ways.
No, I was not expecting the original Donnie Darko in Harvey. Richard Kelly admits not having known about the movie before making his film. Rather, it was Stewart's overembellished courtesy to the point of insincerity to eveyone around him that annoyed me. Ok, sure, I wanted it to be creepier.
ReplyDeleteI'm not so sure you know what you're talking about. You're skipping over everything, you're basing a lot of this on your personal opinion and expectation. You said I Am Sam was inneffective and annoying, you must not be paying close attention to any of these movies. You're barely stating why these movies are bad, and not stating what could have improved them.
ReplyDeleteI am basing everything on personal opinion and expectation. This short selection of films represent particular entries that I found unsatisfying for one reason or another. With I Am Sam, I found Michelle Pfeiffer unbearable, as both character and actress, to the point of distraction. While the story is hearfelt and touching, for me she was a glaring interruption. Further, Elliot Davis's (Twilight, Legally Blonde 2) lighting scheme, pretty as it is, was misplaced and distracting within the context of the story. Perhaps the vibrant color and playful handheld camera reproduced the sense of childlike connection between Sam and his daughter, but it didn't work for me.
ReplyDeleteFilms that I don't find especially interesting recieve less of my thoughts, thus the abbreviated explanations for the above. And since there are such a numerous quantity of films to behold, I prefer to spend my mental energies with those I adore.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete