The Island (2005)

                I had 2 objectives when I decided to watch this movie. 1.) To watch something that I would not have to think about afterwards, and 2.) To watch something that would allow me to test the capabilities of my new stereo system from G-Will.  Needless to say this Michael Bay film met all of my requirements.
              Set in the startlingly near future it left me worried about the fate of mankind, especially our clothing choices.  In a mix of cold gray concrete and sterile white laboratory adorned with LEDs the future us sit at mindless assembly line jobs like the current us.  If there is one thing they didn't learn form us it is how to get robots to do all the busy work.  The rest of the plot is too tedious to explain.
             The film is kind of a Truman Show meets Surrogates meets Michael Bay meets Every Other Crappy Sci-Fi-Dystopian-Neon-Future movie.  A society where everyone is the same, love is forbidden, heaven is just a lottery away, dudes in black are bad, etc.  Luckily the film cuts so fast you don't have to worry about your eyes getting bored.
             Yes this is the movie that Michael Bay would borrow shots from in his later Transformers blockbusters.  This movie cost $126 million and grossed $162.  Think how many smaller movies could have been made for that amount.
              It should go without saying that the vigor and enthusiasm with which I currently write is matches my enthusiasm of the film itself.

In much scarier news, Michael Bay is attached as producer of the upcoming Ninja Turtles reboot...uh oh.

Halloween Night

Baraka (1992)

    14 months.  24 countries.  6 continents.  Sounds like a shoot I’d like to be on.  From the cinematographer of Koyaanisqatsi (1982), John Fricke, comes a similar visual exploration of the diversity across our planet.  From the sky grabbing towers of American cities to the full-body Yakuza tattoos seen in Japanese bathhouses, from lines of yellow taxis stretching into infinity to the stars sweeping across the sky.  We’ve gotten used to the moving camera time-lapse shots that run rampant on Vimeo, but here, they hold a power not reached by current video professionals.  Perhaps the 70mm (i.e. 8K UDHD master) adds a degree of scope not available to anyone with a limited checkbook.  And unlike most 5-minute videos that occupy the internet, Baraka is infinitely mesmerizing.  Little yellow chicks flow like water through a conveyer belt and shoot system.  Hoards of travelers ascend escalators.  Clouds ooze over mountaintops and forests.
    The film appears to be about our relationship with world.  And by us I mean humans, seen here in all shapes, colors, attire, environments, comfort, and age.  Both staged and observational, the countless cultures around the world are immortalized before the camera’s eye.  They manage to interact, or rather exist, in seeming harmony.  Yet the film is one of contradictions.  The mass-produced mechanical repetition of electronics and food soon becomes a montage of bodies sleeping on the streets, of lonely children, of prostitution.  What was first a natural world of immense waterfalls and rainforests has become very unnatural.
    It’s unclear just how judgmental this film is.  While outwardly beautiful, the context is often darkly unfortunate.  Fiery inferno’s flare into the sky across vast oil fields where burned out vehicles are scattered like tombstones. 
    The music is appropriately haunting, at times full and at times empty, yet always capturing the magnificent scope of the visuals involved.  This is a cinematic world lost in much of today’s computer generated foreplay. Everything here is real and amazing be it man-made or natural.  The film lends equal attention to that which is beautiful regardless of its origin.  It treats the absurdity of the world’s religions with equal interest and observation.  We are all different but we are all the same.
    It’s pretty easier to look for some deeper meaning and universal context to the film.  And there is certainly no reason not to.  It is equally easy to let go of any rhyme or reason and allow the visuals to play out, to live out, and to build something bigger.

Enter the Void (2009)

     In a pulsating phantasmagoria of acid-tripped title cards, Noe introduces his latest feature atop a pulse-pounding electronic heartbeat hyped on amphetamines.  There is no doubt that many, many narcotics are to come.  If the endless neon lights of Tokyo side streets weren’t clue enough the POV DMT hit seals the deal.  This is a drug movie.  One that resists the ethical considerations surrounding their use and instead gets strung out on life, death, and sex.  There are no moral debates to the aforementioned topics, unlike Irreversible; Noe doesn’t delve into ethical implications.  Rather, he inhales the intoxicating fumes of Dimethyltryptamine and trips through death in the labyrinthine Tokyo streets.  The viewer must be willing, or equally intoxicated, to join the ride.
    Our point of view is through the eyes of Oscar, a twentysomething American living in Tokyo.  He is also a heavy drug user, a literal motherf*cker, and a prospective spiritualist.  He takes a few hits of DMT, the same chemical released when one is about to die, and disappears into a psychedelic stream…  From the hands of his friend, Alex, comes The Tibetan Book of the Dead.  It tells of the afterlife.  They discuss this existence, explained by the book, as a cycle where the spirit is absorbed into light sources to higher and higher levels.  The concepts are nominally intangible yet conceptually akin to someone accustomed to different plains of consciousness.  As the pair walks the carnival-like streets to The Void we experience every footstep, every blink, nearly every sensory input Oscar receives.  He enters the neon bar, black lights illuminating the darkness like a synthetic Pandora.  Seconds later he is in the bathroom frantically dumping pills into the ground level Japanese toilet.  He hurriedly scrapes them from amongst the cigarette butts and unclean tile.  A bullet rips through his chest; his fingers fumble in the warm blood.  Oscar dies on the disgusting bathroom floor, the only cinematic locale to rival Trainspotting. 
    The remaining two hours are a beautiful nightmare, one in which he watches over his stripper sister; seeing both conception and abortion of her baby.  He drifts through walls, passing countless, rooms, stairways, and endless partitions.  There is a renowned sense of freedom not even possible during the heaviest trips.  He cycles, passing through glowing orbs in the environment before starting again with the events that carry on after his death.  More walls, more lights, more sounds textures and luminescent voids.  Until finally, as dreamed of before death, he floats through a hotel filled with friends.  He glides above room after room of copulating couples and passionate threesomes; a sexual cornucopia that fuses Eyes Wide Shut and 2001 A Space Odyssey into a relentless foray until he becomes, almost perfectly, the starchild.
    Gasper Noe’s style is very much intact.  The opening title cards, perhaps seizure inducing, introduce the strobing, neon color space in which the entire film exists.  Oscar’s room is illuminated heavily by blinking advertisements from outside, shifting from green to purple to red and yellow.  White, it seems, does not exist.  Nearly every shot is from behind his eyes.  The single exception may be his initial DMT hit that slowly floats above even him; but it is still clearly his point of view.  We are treated to the unreal trip sequences as otherworldly shapes intertwine and morph between colors, sometimes resembling dendrites or caterpillars or mind-tunnels to other dimensions.  Present too, in amplified color swirling accents, is raw, uncensored, pornographic exploits.  Where Irreversible teetered between violence and sex, Enter the Void dissolves the former for heavy doses of the latter.
    The film may be the new ultimate trip, clearly influenced by Kubrickian obsessions.  It, too, runs a little long for the conventional viewer yet is fully motivated by its content.  And more than many filmmakers today, Noe has created an experience, one fraught with visual and audible stimulus and intending an experience beyond the typical drama.  In this case, a psychedelic melodrama.

Posters. Posters. Posters.

A giant haul of awesome posters.  No talk just look.

Mash-Ups

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/26/the-best-movie-poster-mas_n_587649.html#s92928&title=undefined

Minimalist

http://www.listal.com/list/minimalist-posters

Alternate Universe

http://hartter.blogspot.com/2009/11/misc.html

Check 'em all out.

Irreversible (2002)

            The first frames are credit roll.  Last names only and backwards E’s, N’s, and R’s.  The words are at first cryptic and stream by in blood red capitals before slowly titling sideways and finally spinning out of control.  This flows naturally into the first shots of the film; tilted, off-angle exteriors with flashing lights and brick walls.  The camera twists and turns out of control, unencumbered by the formal expectations of feature film viewership.  Through the S&M nightclub, The Rectum, Marcus searches for le Tenia (the tapeworm), the man who raped and abused his girlfriend.  He falls victim instead, his arm broken backwards before his friend Pierre smashes the man’s face with a fire extinguisher.  The blows are relentless, the camera-eye unflinching, the metal body unyielding.  The man is left with only his lower jaw and a pile of mush where his face and skull used to be.

            Noe’s film is relentless; a series of long takes playing in reverse chronology that follow a man seeking revenge and the irreversible consequences that take place during a night of extreme violence.  Yet these first few minutes, complete with infrasound at 28Hz, while indeed disturbing and horrific are nothing compared to the inciting incident that takes place in an underpass below the Parisian streets.  Noe is clearly asking if the violence we are introduced to initially is justified by the ungodly time spent in hell; a red lined tunnel converging in the distance, void of any earthly familiarity.

            I’d be inclined to say yes, if the man Pierre obliterated had in fact been le Tenia.  Instead, le Tenia looked on amusedly knowing the pair will soon be arrested and his crime will go unpunished.  The complete lack of consequence with which Tenia observes the murder foreshadows the complete lack of humanity with which he commits his own crime.  If anything, the man’s unrecognizable face is a reminder of earlier in the night.

            It cannot go unquestioned how images like Noe’s can be put on film.  The weight of what they represent and the vérité in which they are presented leave a considerable impression on the viewer’s mind.  It is one that is immediately shocking and unendingly disturbing.  They serve as warning, as cautions, as artistic testaments to the evils of mankind.  Yet we can still wonder why Noe chooses to show what he does; why he wants his audiences to be uncomfortable both physiologically and emotionally.  Is this exploitation cinema or are they raw warnings?  For me, the jury is still out but both remain plausible explanations.

Buried (2010)

            The simplicity of this film’s plot is equaled only by its absurdity; a guy wakes up in a coffin buried beneath the earth and spends the rest of the movie trying to get out.  For many, the premise is immediately laughable and quickly extinguished.  Can one really expect to carry and audience for and hour and a half stuck in a single, solitary, claustrophobic location?  And what’s more, will anyone care to try?

            From a production standpoint this film is genius; one on-screen actor, one location, how they sank $3 million into it its beyond me.  I could have filmed the entire thing in my backyard.  From a writing standpoint it would be a great experiment in MacGyver-esque problem solving with extreme limitations and very few opportunities.  From an acting standpoint it's the chance for an intense and varied one-man-show; you have to carry the whole movie.  And from an audience standpoint, especially one with increasingly critical eyes, it's a chance to see just how well the publicity stunt comes off.  (Why didn’t Criss Angel star?)

            This film could not have existed before the digital age (except of course the period when coffins had a pulley system with an above ground bell because people were afraid of being buried alive, estimated running time- 2 minutes).  A guy wakes up buried; he panics, and then dies.  The importance of a cell phone is beyond words as a literal and physical lifeline.  Is this a plot necessity or a comment on our culture’s incessant need and craving for the devices?  A plot necessity of course!  Before time and air run out (built-in suspense) our protagonist, Paul, must find out where he is and how someone can get him out.  Turns out he is in Iraq and being held ransom by terrorists.  I haven’t decided if this is efficient terrorist stratagem or not.  You don’t need to hide a body because you already did yet neither does your opponent.  Luckily, he finds a few various tools, which nearly all give light.  With these, we are able to share the confined experience as he fumbles endlessly with phone calls to the outside world he (SPOILER ALERT) will never see again. 

            The film is immediately gimmicky and makes no point in going anywhere else.  It can’t.  Yet for mindlessly simple set-up it manages, despite expectations, to hold on for nearly the entirety of hits running-time.  The visuals are varied enough between the different colored light sources and changes in composition that the eyes are not instantly tired.  If anything, the film could have developed its claustrophobic intents a bit stronger by resisting long pullouts.  Without a doubt the concept is flawed from the beginning but if we lend the freedom, it manages it well.  That is until a snake finds he way in and out of his pants and he proceeds to attempt setting it on fire inside of a tiny box.  I don’t know if he realized he was also in this tiny box.  Regardless, these extreme moments are few and if anything the film should be commended on its success at fulfilling what it set out to do.

            That is, bury a man, and follow him for the hour and a half (SPOILER ALERT) leading up to his death.  We can argue all day about plot holes and inconsistencies, not limited to talking on the phone upside down.  But this would miss the few points that the film tries to make or the comments it offers on our culture.  There are so many pressures from uncounted sources that we literally feel trapped and we don’t know how we got there.  Or, that one must literally think-outside-the-box to save his life.  Or that studios are always confining artistic freedom within an acceptable box to the point that it crushes the artist.  Or that the War in Iraq was such a waste; we were literally burying people alive.  Or…

They Live (1988)

     I’ll preface by saying that this 1988 John Carpenter sci-fi film is up for a remake in the next year or two and the sunglasses will be absent.  Granted, this small fact will mean nothing if one has not seen the film in which aliens are cloaked in human form along with their subconscious commercialism brainwashing.  The hidden intergalactic race and their signs to buy more and obey orders are hidden to the human eye without the aid of oversized 80’s sunglasses.  In short, the entire premise of the movie relies on the glasses, as does its relevance as a late 1980’s artifact.
    Nada (nothing in Spanish) is also oversized and, should Mickey Rourke die sometime soon, be perfect for a biopic.  He’s a loner that finds a job in construction, befriends Keith David, and is introduced to a community of cooperative slum life where his handyman knowledge is much valued.  But if this film was composed entirely of a thick-necked loose-footed real-life pro-wrestler it would be about seven minutes long and conclude with him being crowned king of a small group of metal-sided shacks in the middle of a Los Angeles neighborhood.  Instead, an invisible species of aliens, conveniently shaped exactly like humans, inhabit human form and litter our world with simple messages of consumerism.  The most instantly recognizable is that with the instruction to obey.  Shepard Fairey would later construct the most successful street art campaign by pairing it with a stenciled Andre the Giant.  Conveniently enough, both Andre and Roddy Piper inhabit the pro-wrestling circuit.

    Our star happens upon a group of citizens aware of the secret alien race and blessed with the ability to see their disgusting faces, which resemble alien baby.  Life imitating art.  Naturally, a battle ensues as the knowers try to convince everyone else of the aliens controlling their money spending.  Unfortunately, the aliens have law enforcement on their side.  Fortunately, the humans have Nada.  In his best salute to Rambo he guns down alien after alien.  His mannerisms may be a bit reserved but he lets his fists do the talking.
    Carpenter is making some rather strong and obvious stabs at the state of consumerism in the late 80’s.  A society made of money hungry consumers who care more for their individual happiness than the health of their world does indeed warrant a rather alien feeling.  At the same time, keeping the aliens hidden recalls the marketing techniques employed that aim to promote a society of spenders.  Only when you can truly see what is in front of your eyes can you act any different towards the world around you, and hopefully more responsibly.  So a remake ditching the retro shades would be both disappointing and unwarranted.  A make-over seem more appropriate.
    But does this movie warrant a remake?  On the one hand no, it is just fine as is.  Some remakes are obviously just trying to cash in on something that has already worked without putting up too much money for something new to be written.  On the other hand, yes.  It is an awesome sci-fi film indicative of its time period that could be reworked for a modern audience; an audience that clearly has neither seen the original nor learned anything since its release.  Of course, we have seen this message before and most people don’t react positively when they perceive messages to be rammed down their throats.  My only hope is that they reenact the 5mintue and 20 second fight scene in a back alley that in no way propels the plot yet remains deliciously fun for any cult film fan.